Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the rejection of the books of account and the consequent estimation of taxable turnover under the State and Central tax laws were justified.
Analysis: The dealer's returns did not tally with the account books, and the assessing authority relied on the survey report, the show-cause notice, and the dealer's failure to appear or explain the seized bilities before the Sales Tax Officer. The decline in turnover was not the sole basis for rejection, and the explanation offered for that fall did not cure the other discrepancies. The dealer also admitted an inter-State sale not disclosed in the Central return and did not file any revised return. On these facts, the authorities had material to conclude that the accounts were not properly maintained and that turnover had been suppressed.
Conclusion: The rejection of the books of account and the estimation of turnover were upheld, and no interference was called for in revisional jurisdiction.