Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether reassessment proceedings under section 21 of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 were validly initiated where the original assessment order was a non-speaking summary order and the material/reply filed by the dealer had not been considered on merits.
Analysis: The original assessment record showed that although a show-cause notice and reply were on file, the assessment was completed by a summary order without consideration of the reply on merits. In such circumstances, the claim regarding the nature of sale of bone meal remained unscrutinised, and the case was not one of a mere change of opinion. Reassessment can be initiated where relevant material on record was not considered or escaped the notice of the assessing authority. The absence of a reasoned consideration in the original assessment distinguished the matter from cases where reassessment is barred because the same material had already been examined.
Conclusion: The reassessment proceedings were validly initiated; the finding of change of opinion was and the revision succeeded in favour of the Department.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the original assessment is non-speaking and the relevant material or reply has not been considered on merits, reopening is justified on the ground of non-application of mind and is not barred as a mere change of opinion.