Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the account books of the dealer could be rejected and the assessment made on best judgment basis solely on the strength of a cash memo allegedly recovered from a third party, without producing that person for cross-examination and without confronting the document to the dealer.
Analysis: Section 7 of the U.P. Trade Tax Act requires a dealer to maintain true and correct accounts and permits best judgment assessment only when the return is found to be incorrect or incomplete. The proviso to Section 7(3) contemplates a reasonable opportunity to prove correctness and completeness, which includes the opportunity of cross-examination where reliance is placed on material adverse to the dealer. The only basis for rejecting the books was a cash memo not recovered from the dealer and not supported by any defect in the maintained accounts. Since the Department did not produce the third party for cross-examination, the document could not be treated as reliable material against the dealer. At most it created suspicion, and suspicion alone could not justify rejection of the books or the consequent enhancement.
Conclusion: The rejection of the account books and the restoration of the assessment order were unsustainable. The issue is decided in favour of the assessee.