Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the demand notice issued for recovery of interest under section 13(2) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 was illegal on the ground that the petitioner had already remitted the principal tax arrears and was allegedly not given credit for the payment.
Analysis: The demand notice was found to relate not to a duplicate recovery of the principal tax arrears, but to the interest payable on the outstanding arrears. The record showed that the amount already paid by the petitioner had been credited and that the impugned demand substantially corresponded to an earlier communication raising the interest liability. The petitioner's assertion of surprise and illegality was therefore held to be without merit, and the writ was characterised as lacking bona fides in view of the suppression of the true nature of the demand.
Conclusion: The demand notice was upheld as lawful and enforceable, and the challenge to it failed.