Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a writ petition was maintainable to quash a notice issued under section 13(3)(b) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 for recovery of assessed tax arrears when the assessment order itself was under challenge in another writ petition.
Analysis: The notice under section 13(3)(b) was held to be only a step indicating the Revenue's proposed course for recovery of tax arrears. The provision merely enables recovery of assessed tax by application to the jurisdictional magistrate, and the notice itself does not determine rights or effect recovery by itself. Since the assessment liability was already in issue in another proceeding, an independent writ petition challenging the recovery notice was treated as unnecessary and without a justifiable cause of action. The proper course was to seek relief in the pending writ petition challenging the assessment order.
Conclusion: The writ petition was not maintainable and the challenge to the recovery notice failed.