Failure to consider documentary evidence led to remand in a sales tax revision on contract works and inter-State sale issues.

The revisional tax order was set aside because the authority gave only a cryptic finding on whether the head office executed the contract works and whether there was any inter-State sale, without examining the documentary material placed by both sides. As the nature of the transaction and the place of execution could not be reliably determined on the existing record, the matter was remanded for fresh disposal in accordance with law. The authority was directed to consider the documents and afford both parties a proper opportunity before deciding the tax liability conclusively.

---

---

Issues: Whether the revisional order assessing the transaction to tax under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 was liable to be set aside for failure to consider the documentary material and whether the matter required remand for fresh consideration.

Analysis: The revisional authority recorded only a cryptic conclusion that the head office had executed the contract works and that there was no inter-State sale, but it did not examine the documentary material produced by both sides. The court found that the nature of the transaction and the place of execution could not be determined on the existing record without proper scrutiny of the documents. Since the authority had not dealt with the relevant material, the order was treated as unsatisfactory for adjudicating the tax liability conclusively.

Conclusion: The revisional order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the revisional authority for fresh disposal in accordance with law after considering the documentary material and after affording due opportunity to both parties.

---