Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Tax Board was justified in setting aside the remand order and affirming that no works contract tax could be levied on the import of raw material for tyre retreading.
Analysis: The Tax Board, as the final fact-finding and appellate authority under the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994, was competent to examine both facts and law and to record its own conclusion despite the first appellate authority's remand. The Board relied on the Supreme Court's ruling that the import of binding gum and rubber for tyre retreading was not exigible to works contract tax, and therefore found that no purpose would be served by remanding the matter to the assessing authority.
Conclusion: The interference with the remand order was justified, and the finding that no tax was leviable was upheld in favour of the assessee.