Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether advance value added tax could be recovered from labour charges included in composite bills raised in execution of a works contract, and whether the contractor was required to segregate the amounts attributable to transfer of property in goods and labour charges.
Analysis: Section 41 of the Bihar Value Added Tax Act, 2005 authorises recovery of advance value added tax only from the consideration payable in respect of transfer of property in goods. Rule 29 of the Bihar Value Added Tax Rules, 2005 makes it clear that no deduction is to be made from amounts referable to labour charges or other amounts excluded by the rule while deducting advance tax. Since the bills were composite and did not separately disclose the amounts relatable to goods and labour, the payer was justified in deducting tax only to the extent legally recoverable, and the contractor was directed to resubmit the bills with separate particulars.
Conclusion: Advance value added tax was not recoverable on labour charges, and deduction was confined to the taxable component relating to transfer of property in goods. The writ petition was accordingly disposed of with directions beneficial to the petitioner in respect of future and unpaid bills.