TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether refund under section 40(2) of the Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005 could be withheld merely because a revision was pending, and whether the authority was bound to record reasons and base its opinion on relevant material before concluding that payment of refund was likely to adversely affect the Revenue.
Analysis: Section 40(2) confers power to withhold refund only where the authority is of the opinion, with previous approval of the Deputy Commissioner, that grant of refund is likely to adversely affect the Revenue. Such power is not unfettered or absolute. The formation of opinion must be founded on relevant material, applied to with due consideration, and the approving authority must record reasons so that the exercise of power can be scrutinised. Mere pendency of an appeal or revision, without more, does not justify withholding refund. The record disclosed no material showing that recovery from the assessee would become difficult or that the assessee was otherwise likely to defeat recovery.
Conclusion: The withholding of refund was unjustified, the impugned order was unsustainable, and the refund with interest had to be paid to the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: The statutory power to withhold a refund under section 40(2) of the Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005 can be exercised only on a reasoned, material-based opinion that release of the refund is likely to adversely affect the Revenue; mere pendency of proceedings is insufficient.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
