Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the provision requiring deduction of tax at source from works-contract payments at a flat rate of 12.5% irrespective of taxable turnover was within legislative competence and valid.
Analysis: The scheme of the tax enactment treated transfer of property in goods involved in execution of a works contract as a taxable sale, but only to the extent permitted by the constitutional limitations governing sales tax, including exclusions for inter-State sales, outside sales, import or export sales, declared goods, exempt goods, and labour and service components. Taxable turnover was therefore required to be computed after excluding non-taxable components. The impugned provision, however, mandated deduction at a uniform flat rate on the gross amount payable under the works contract, without a mechanism to exclude amounts not exigible to tax. Such a provision could operate upon amounts beyond the State's taxing power and beyond the charging provision, and could also conflict with the prescribed tax rates and deductions under the Act and Rules.
Conclusion: The provision was held ultra vires and invalid to the extent it permitted deduction at a flat rate of 12.5% irrespective of taxable turnover, and the consequential notice was also quashed.