Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the writ petition challenging the show-cause notice under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 should be entertained when the petitioner could place its objections and subsequent developments before the assessing authority.
Analysis: The demand notice related to recovery of sales tax with interest under section 24(3) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959. The Court noted that the BIFR scheme covered penalty and interest on belated tax payment, while the tax itself had already been paid. It also noticed that the petitioner's application under the Samadhan Scheme was pending and that the petitioner could raise all subsequent developments before the respondent in reply to the notice. In these circumstances, the Court found that the matter did not call for writ adjudication at that stage.
Conclusion: The writ petition was not entertained on merits against the show-cause notice, and the petitioner was left to file objections before the respondent.