Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner industrial unit was entitled to sales tax exemption as a priority industry under the Industrial Policy Resolution, 1996, and whether the impugned minutes and consequential revisional and demand proceedings denying that benefit were liable to be quashed.
Analysis: The petitioner's entitlement turned on the same legal question that had already been decided in the connected matter, namely whether a priority industry under the Industrial Policy Resolution, 1996 could be denied the sales tax exemption contemplated by the relevant exemption entry. The Court adopted the reasoning in the connected judgment, held that the petitioner's unit fell within the protected category of priority industries, and treated the impugned departmental action, including the minutes of the meeting relied upon by the authorities, as inconsistent with the entitlement flowing from the policy and notification framework.
Conclusion: The petitioner was held entitled to avail sales tax exemption in accordance with the Industrial Policy Resolution, 1996, and the impugned minutes of the Commissioner's meeting were quashed.