Eligibility certificate withdrawal requires proof of actual misuse; a solitary suspicious circumstance and delayed action are insufficient.

Withdrawal of an eligibility certificate under section 4A(3) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act requires proof of actual misuse by the certificate holder. On the facts discussed, the exemption could not be cancelled because the goods were supported by a bill and excise gate pass, the declared turnover of manufactured goods was accepted, and no material showed that another unit had manufactured the goods. A single circumstance that packing material bore another unit's name was not enough, especially where the explanation of a common vendor's mistake was not disproved. Belated initiation after the inspection and near expiry of the exemption period further weakened the withdrawal action.

---

---

Issues: Whether the eligibility certificate granted under section 4A of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 could be withdrawn under section 4A(3) on the basis of a solitary inspection and alleged misuse, and whether the delayed initiation and withdrawal of proceedings were justified.

Analysis: The applicant's exemption could be cancelled only if actual misuse of the eligibility certificate was reasonably established. The record showed that the goods were accompanied by a bill and excise gate pass, the declared turnover of manufactured goods had been accepted, and no material established that the goods were in fact manufactured by another unit. The only adverse circumstance was an isolated finding that the packing material bore another unit's name, while the explanation that such material had been supplied by a common vendor by mistake was not disproved. No further instance of misuse was shown. The proceedings were also initiated long after the inspection and after the exemption period had substantially run its course, which undermined the withdrawal action.

Conclusion: The withdrawal of exemption under section 4A(3) was not sustainable, and the assessee succeeded.

Ratio Decidendi: Cancellation of an eligibility certificate requires proof of actual misuse by the holder, and a solitary suspicious circumstance or belated action without supporting material is insufficient.

---