Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was liable to pay entry tax under the Karnataka Tax on Entry of Goods Act, 1979 on the footing that it had caused entry of chassis into the local area on behalf of its customer.
Analysis: Liability under section 3(2) arises where a registered dealer or dealer liable to register brings or causes goods to be brought into a local area, whether on his own account or on account of his principal, and the Explanation deems the dealer to have brought or caused to be brought the goods where delivery is taken in the specified manner. On the facts found, the chassis had been purchased by the customer and supplied to the assessee for construction of the bus body within its workshop. The assessee did not itself bring the chassis into the local area, nor was there any factual basis to treat it as the person who caused such entry. The deeming provision was therefore inapplicable.
Conclusion: The assessee was not liable to pay entry tax for causing entry of the chassis into the local area, and the demand and concurrent orders were unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: Entry tax liability under section 3(2) attaches only when the dealer, on the proved facts, brings or causes the goods to be brought into the local area, and a mere activity of building body on customer-supplied chassis within the dealer's premises does not by itself attract the deeming provision.