Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for the purpose of the turnover limit of exemption under the notification dated 27.02.1997, the assessee's entire turnover was to be taken into account or only the taxable turnover.
Analysis: The notification granted exemption up to a specified turnover to institutions registered with the U.P. Khadi Gramodyog Board, and the relevant clause was read on its plain language. The clause did not distinguish between taxable turnover and turnover not liable to tax under other provisions of the Act. On a simple reading, the turnover limit was held to refer to the entire turnover of the assessee, and not merely to the portion on which tax was payable. The inability to maintain separate accounts for the different categories of purchases and sales also supported the conclusion that segregation of turnover was not possible on the facts.
Conclusion: The entire turnover of the assessee had to be considered for computing the exemption limit, including turnover not liable to tax under other provisions. The challenge to the Tribunal's order failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the language of an exemption notification is plain and unambiguous, the turnover limit prescribed by it must be applied to the assessee's entire turnover, without excluding sales already exempt from tax under other provisions, unless the notification itself makes such exclusion.