Cable television in hospital rooms can constitute entertainment when bundled with paid accommodation and managed by the hospital trust.

Cable television shown in hospital rooms and common areas was held to fall within the statutory meaning of "entertainment" because the facility was provided as part of paid accommodation and the charges for graded rooms indirectly covered the amenity, even without a separate television fee. The hospital trust was also treated as a "proprietor" because it provided, managed, and led the television facility as part of the hospital services. On that reasoning, entertainment duty was sustained and the writ challenge failed.

---

---

Issues: (i) whether cable television exhibition in hospital rooms and common areas constituted "entertainment" attracting entertainment duty under section 2(a) of the Act; (ii) whether the trust running the hospital was a "proprietor" in relation to such entertainment under section 2(c) of the Act.

Issue (i): whether cable television exhibition in hospital rooms and common areas constituted "entertainment" attracting entertainment duty under section 2(a) of the Act.

Analysis: The definition covered television exhibition by cable network where persons were required to make payment by way of contribution, subscription, installation and connection charges, or any other charges collected in any manner whatsoever. Even if no separate amount was recovered specifically for watching television, the patients paid room charges for accommodation in graded rooms whose facilities included television. The absence of a separate television fee did not exclude the facility from the statutory concept of entertainment.

Conclusion: The television exhibition in the hospital amounted to "entertainment" within section 2(a) and attracted the duty.

Issue (ii): whether the trust running the hospital was a "proprietor" in relation to such entertainment under section 2(c) of the Act.

Analysis: The statutory definition of proprietor included persons responsible for management, connected with the organisation, or in charge of the management of the entertainment. Since the hospital trust provided and managed the television facility as part of the hospital premises and services, it fell within the inclusive definition.

Conclusion: The trust was a "proprietor" in relation to the entertainment under section 2(c).

Final Conclusion: The demand of entertainment duty was sustained and the writ petition failed.

Ratio Decidendi: Where a cable television facility is provided as part of paid room accommodation and forms one of the amenities for which charges are indirectly recovered, it constitutes entertainment under the Act, and the person managing that facility is a proprietor for the purpose of liability to entertainment duty.

---