Broad interpretation of cement and exclusion of separately charged packing costs from turnover tax under sales tax law.

The Karnataka High Court construed "cement" in entry 7 of Part C of the Second Schedule to the Karnataka Sales Tax Act broadly and held that the grouting material sold as "Shrinkkomp" remained cement despite its special expanding properties and use for grouting. It also held that separately specified packing material charges were excluded from turnover tax under section 6B because the proviso to that section governs the deduction scheme and such charges, when separately shown and not included in the goods price, cannot be added back. The classification issue was decided against the assessee, while the turnover tax issue was decided in its favour.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the grouting material sold as "Shrinkkomp" is "cement" within entry 7 of Part C of the Second Schedule to the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957; and (ii) whether packing material charges specified and charged separately in the sales invoice are includible in turnover for levy of turnover tax under section 6B of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957.

Issue (i): Whether the grouting material sold as "Shrinkkomp" is "cement" within entry 7 of Part C of the Second Schedule to the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957.

Analysis: "Cement" was construed in its broad commercial sense to include different varieties of binding materials used for construction and special purposes. The special properties of Shrinkkomp, including its expanding character and use for grouting, did not alter its essential nature as a cement. A brand name or special application does not change the basic character of the goods. Entry 7 covers cement generally and is not confined to Portland cement.

Conclusion: Shrinkkomp is cement and falls under entry 7 of Part C of the Second Schedule to the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957, against the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether packing material charges specified and charged separately in the sales invoice are includible in turnover for levy of turnover tax under section 6B of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957.

Analysis: Section 6B is an independent charging provision for turnover tax, and the deduction scheme under section 5 does not govern its computation. Clause (vii) of the proviso to section 6B(1) expressly excludes amounts shown as charges for packing material and labour when separately specified and charged without being included in the price of the goods. Section 5(3D), which deals with tax on containers and packing materials, could not be imported to override the plain language of section 6B.

Conclusion: Separately specified packing material charges are not liable to turnover tax under section 6B, in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The challenge succeeded only on the turnover tax question, while the classification of Shrinkkomp as cement was upheld; the matter was sent back for reassessment in line with that determination.

Ratio Decidendi: For turnover tax under section 6B, the statutory proviso itself governs deductions, and amounts separately shown as packing material charges cannot be added to turnover; separately, a special-purpose expansion cement remains "cement" where the statutory entry uses that generic description.

---