Limitation for challenging seizure and penalty actions requires filing within the statutory period unless sufficient cause for delay is shown.

Applications challenging seizure of goods and penalty were treated as time-barred under section 8(2) of the West Bengal Taxation Tribunal Act, 1987 because they were filed well after the seizures and penalty deposits, and seizure receipts had been received by the carrier in most cases, indicating knowledge of the action. No sufficient cause was shown to excuse the delay, so the applications were held not maintainable. The text also notes that the challenge to penalty was, in any event, a matter for the revisional forum.

---

---

Issues: Whether the applications challenging seizure of goods and imposition of penalty were barred by limitation under section 8(2) of the West Bengal Taxation Tribunal Act, 1987.

Analysis: The applications were filed long after the seizures and penalty deposits, and the record showed that seizure receipts had been received by the carrier in most cases. In these circumstances, the applicants were treated as having knowledge of the action taken against them, yet they approached the Tribunal only after expiry of the sixty-day period prescribed by section 8(2). No sufficient cause was shown for the delay. The challenge to the penalty, in any event, was a matter for the revisional forum.

Conclusion: The applications were barred by limitation under section 8(2) and were not maintainable.

Ratio Decidendi: A challenge to seizure and penalty under the West Bengal Taxation Tribunal Act, 1987 must be brought within sixty days of the action taken, unless sufficient cause for delay is shown; otherwise the application is barred.

---