Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the sales made to Nepal buyers were sales in the course of export so as to qualify for exemption from tax.
Analysis: Exemption under section 5 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 is available only where the sale occasions the export or is effected by transfer of title documents after the goods cross the customs frontiers. A mere sale followed by export by the purchaser is not enough. The sale and the export must form an integrated transaction with a direct and inseparable link, so that the export is occasioned by the sale. On the facts found, delivery was taken by the Nepali purchasers at Varanasi, the seller retained no control over the goods after sale, and the purchasers were free to carry the goods to Nepal on their own. There was no obligation on the buyers to export under the contract and no bond between the sale and the actual export.
Conclusion: The sales were not in the course of export and were not exempt from tax.
Ratio Decidendi: A sale qualifies as a sale in the course of export only when it occasions the export and is so integrated with the export that the two cannot be separated into independent transactions; a sale completed in India, followed by export at the purchaser's volition, does not satisfy section 5.