TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court quashes entry tax, clarifies KGST Act liabilities.</h1> <h3>Chakkiath Engineering Works Versus Sales Tax Officer (Audit), Export And Import Department of Commercial Taxes, Ernakulam and another</h3> The court quashed the assessment order and penalty, prohibiting the imposition of entry tax on similar transactions in the future. The court clarified ... - Issues involved:Challenge to assessment order and penalty under the Kerala Tax on Entry of Goods into Local Areas Act, 1994.Analysis:The petitioner challenged the assessment order and penalty issued under the Kerala Tax on Entry of Goods into Local Areas Act, 1994. The petitioner assembled chassis supplied by a foreign party in semi knocked down condition (SKD), built bus bodies in Kerala, and exported the buses to the same party. The petitioner contended that entry tax was not applicable as the chassis were not used, sold, or consumed in Kerala. The court considered whether the imported chassis attracted entry tax and analyzed the provisions of the Act. The court noted that the chassis were assembled for easy packing and transportation and rejected the argument that they were not covered under the Act. The court also discussed the amendments to the Act regarding entry tax on motor vehicle chassis and related components. The court highlighted that the petitioner did not use or sell the imported chassis, leading to the question of whether there was consumption of the chassis. The court examined the concept of consumption in the context of building bus bodies on the chassis and concluded that the petitioner did not consume the chassis by constructing the bus bodies. The court ruled that the assessment of entry tax on the imported chassis for export was untenable, and consequently, the penalty proposed was also dismissed. The court allowed the petition and prohibited the imposition of entry tax on similar transactions in the future, while indicating that liability for purchase tax or sales tax under the KGST Act could be considered separately.In conclusion, the court quashed the assessment order and penalty, prohibiting the imposition of entry tax on similar transactions in the future. The court clarified that liability for purchase tax or sales tax under the KGST Act could be examined separately.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
