Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Tribunal was justified in setting aside the acquisition proceedings initiated under section 28A of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 on the ground that the competent authority had not properly ascertained the fair market price and had not satisfied the statutory requirements for invoking the power.
Analysis: The material relied upon by the competent authority showed fluctuating and unsupported estimates of the stock value, while the Tribunal found that the fair market price had not been ascertained in the manner contemplated by section 2(gg) of the Act. The authority had adopted different methods and different values at different stages, and the record did not establish a proper factual basis for the conclusion that the case attracted section 28A. The majority of the Tribunal, including the third Member, recorded concurrent findings that the statutory conditions for acquisition were not satisfied.
Conclusion: The Tribunal's order setting aside the acquisition proceedings was upheld and no interference was called for in revision.