Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the transfer of the entire mill after closure of business amounted to a sale of goods effected during the course of business and was liable to sales tax under the Gujarat Sales Tax Act, 1969.
Analysis: The transfer was found to have occurred after discontinuance and closure of the business, not as a transfer in the course of an ongoing business. Under the scheme of the Act, sales tax attaches to turnover of sales effected during the course of business, and a sale after closure of business does not constitute such taxable turnover. The prior Division Bench view that a sale made after closure of business is not exigible to tax supported this conclusion.
Conclusion: The transfer of the closed mill was not a sale of goods in the course of business and the sale proceeds were not liable to tax.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered against the Revenue and the tax and consequential levy could not be sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: A transfer made after the closure of business is not a sale effected in the course of business and is not exigible to sales tax under the Act.