Retrospective tax amendment upheld where laminated goods were treated as clarificatory, not as creating a fresh levy or burden.

Retrospective amendment of entries C-II-9 and C-II-61 in Schedule C to the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 was upheld as constitutionally valid. The amendment was treated as clarificatory because laminated sheets had already been assessed and traded under entry C-II-61 at 12 per cent during the relevant period, so no fresh levy or additional burden was created. The court also held that a separate Central Excise Tribunal ruling under another statute did not govern interpretation of the sales tax entry. Challenges based on arbitrariness, discrimination, deprivation of refund, and vagueness failed because the amendment applied uniformly to laminated goods and clarified the intended tax treatment.

---

---

Issues: Whether section 25 of the Maharashtra Tax Laws (Levy, Amendment and Repeal) Act, 1989, retrospectively amending entries C-II-9 and C-II-61 of Schedule C to the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, was constitutionally valid.

Analysis: The goods in question were, throughout the relevant period, treated in trade and in assessments as laminated sheets covered by entry C-II-61 and taxed at 12 per cent. The retrospective amendment did not impose a fresh levy or create any additional burden; it only made explicit what was already implicit in the original entry and resolved the controversy generated by later refund and reclassification claims. The decision of the Central Excise Tribunal on a different tariff structure under another statute did not control the interpretation of the Bombay Sales Tax Act. The challenge based on arbitrariness, discrimination, refund deprivation, and vagueness also failed because the amendment applied uniformly to the class of laminated goods and merely clarified their intended tax treatment.

Conclusion: The retrospective amendment was held to be valid and not unconstitutional; the challenge was rejected.

---