Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the movement of goods from the assessee to the Bombay party was in the course of export and not an inter-State sale.
Analysis: The transaction was governed by a written agency arrangement under which the Bombay party acted as agent for procuring export orders and exporting the goods. The agreement, which was not disputed, showed that the Bombay party received the export proceeds, deducted commission and credited the balance to the dealers, indicating that the export activity was part of a single transaction linked with the movement of goods from Mathura to the foreign buyers. The absence of a direct contract between the dealers and the foreign purchasers did not defeat the export character of the transaction, since the Bombay party acted as an agent and the provisions relating to an undisclosed principal recognize that the real nature of the contract is not altered by non-disclosure. The case relied upon by the Revenue was distinguished because it involved a sale on principal to principal basis, whereas the present transaction was one of agency.
Conclusion: The movement of goods was in the course of export and not an inter-State sale; the revisions therefore failed.