Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether maize and flattened maize (maize poha) are the same commodity covered by the entry for maize in the Second Schedule to the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963, or whether maize poha is a commercially different commodity taxable under the residuary entry.
Analysis: The relevant entry in the Second Schedule is exhaustive in its use of the words "that is to say", and cereals listed therein must be confined to the specified commodities. The Court applied the common parlance and functional tests, together with the principles governing declared goods under sections 14 and 15 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. It held that maize poha is produced by heating, steaming and flattening maize, that the raw material is consumed in the process, and that the product acquires a different size, shape, structure, utility and edible character. On that reasoning, maize poha is a processed and commercially distinct commodity, and the residuary entry applies where no specific entry covers it.
Conclusion: Maize and maize poha are commercially different commodities, and maize poha is not covered by maize in entry 9 of the Second Schedule to the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a commodity listed in an exhaustive tariff entry undergoes processing that brings into existence a commercially distinct product with a different identity and use, the processed product is not treated as the original commodity for sales tax classification.