Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to exemption from purchase tax on rubber wood used for manufacture, in light of the exemption certificate and the governing notification, and whether the reassessment and appellate orders denying such exemption were liable to be interfered with.
Analysis: The exemption was claimed under the industrial incentive scheme, but the controversy turned on the true scope of the certificate issued by the District Industries Centre. The certificate expressly covered exemption on goods manufactured and sold, and did not grant exemption from purchase tax. The relevant goods were also not taxable at the last purchase point. In these circumstances, the principle applied in the Supreme Court decision on the meaning of a similar exemption notification governed the case. The authorities relied upon by the assessee on interference with an exemption certificate were distinguishable because those cases concerned an attempt by a lower authority to dilute a benefit actually granted by a superior authority, whereas here no purchase tax exemption had been granted at all.
Conclusion: The assessee was not entitled to exemption from purchase tax, and the reassessment and appellate orders denying the claim were upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: An exemption certificate or notification granting relief on manufacture and sale does not, by implication, extend to purchase tax where the certificate does not expressly grant such relief and the goods are not taxable at the last purchase point.