Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the provisional attachment made under section 27(2)(a) of the Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005 could survive after assessment for one year had already been completed, and whether the attachment was valid when no prescribed authority had formed the requisite opinion for protecting the interests of the Revenue.
Analysis: Section 27(2)(a) authorises provisional attachment during the pendency of assessment or reassessment only where the prescribed authority is of the opinion that such action is necessary to protect the interests of the Revenue, and with the previous approval of the Commissioner. The completed assessment for 2004-05 rendered the attachment meaningless for that year. For the remaining year, the record showed no formation of the statutory opinion by any competent authority. Mere correspondence seeking approval on the ground that heavy demands might arise later did not satisfy the statutory precondition for attachment.
Conclusion: The provisional attachment was invalid and could not be sustained.