Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellate authority could refuse to entertain the assessee's rectification application on the ground that the appeal had already been disposed of.
Analysis: Section 37 of the Assam General Sales Tax Act, 1993 confers power on the appellate authority to rectify arithmetical mistakes and other factual mistakes apparent on the face of the record. The refusal in this case was not based on a finding that no rectification was warranted, but on the mistaken view that disposal of the appeal itself denuded the authority of power to consider rectification. Since the statute empowered the appellate authority to examine the application within the limits of section 37, the jurisdiction could not be declined on that ground.
Conclusion: The refusal to entertain the rectification application was unsustainable, and the application had to be taken on record and decided in accordance with law after hearing the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The assessee succeeded, and the rectification application was directed to be considered on merits by the appellate authority.
Ratio Decidendi: An appellate authority retaining statutory power of rectification cannot decline to exercise that jurisdiction merely because the appeal has already been disposed of, where the statute permits correction of apparent factual or arithmetical mistakes.