1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>High Court classifies machinery repairs as revenue expenditure for assessment year 1978-79</h1> The High Court of Madras ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the expenditure on repairs and renewals of machinery should be classified as ... Capital Expenditure, Revenue Expenditure, Replacement Of Parts, Manufacture Of Yarn Issues Involved: Determination of whether expenditure on repairs and renewals of machinery constitutes revenue or capital expenditure for the assessment year 1978-79.Summary:The High Court of Madras considered a case where an assessee-company engaged in the manufacture and sale of yarn incurred an expenditure on repairs and renewals of machinery during the relevant assessment year. The Income-tax Officer treated the expenditure as capital, while the Commissioner and the Tribunal held it to be revenue expenditure. The Commissioner noted that the replacements of minor parts did not increase the mill's capacity significantly and were necessary for the continued operation of the business without substantial changes to the production apparatus. The Tribunal agreed that the replacements were essential for maintaining the business and did not amount to a fresh investment in capital goods. Therefore, the Tribunal's decision to treat the expenditure as revenue was upheld by the High Court.In conclusion, the High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the expenditure on repairs and renewals of machinery should be considered as revenue expenditure for the assessment year 1978-79.