Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an eligibility certificate granted under rule 28-A of the Haryana General Sales Tax Rules, 1975 could be withdrawn on the ground that the dealer had not filed the change of land use certificate along with form ST-70.
Analysis: The dispute concerned withdrawal of an already granted eligibility certificate, not rejection of an application at the threshold. Non-submission of the change of land use certificate may justify refusal of eligibility at the stage of grant, but it does not fall within the grounds for withdrawal of a certificate once granted under sub-rule (8) of rule 28-A. The alleged violations under the Punjab Scheduled Roads and Controlled Areas Restriction of Unregulated Development Act, 1973 were treated as irrelevant to the issue before the Court.
Conclusion: The eligibility certificate could not be withdrawn on the ground of non-filing of the change of land use certificate, and the challenge to the withdrawal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: A certificate already granted under rule 28-A cannot be withdrawn on a ground that is relevant only to grant at the threshold and is not one of the statutorily permitted grounds for withdrawal.