Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the reassessment and penalty were sustainable where the dealer's sales and purchases were found to be colourable transactions entered into to evade tax, and whether the matter was governed by section 14(4) or section 14-B of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957.
Analysis: The turnover disclosed by the dealer was found to be suppressed through transactions between the dealer and another firm managed by the same person. The sales and repurchases were treated as mere book entries and ignored for tax purposes, the real taxable turnover being determined on the basis of the genuine transactions. On those facts, the case was not one of mere sale at a price below market price falling within section 14-B, but one of escaped turnover and evasion reflected by colourable dealings. The finding of wilful suppression, already recorded in the assessment proceedings and not rebutted in the penalty proceedings, justified penalty under section 14(8). The earlier decision relied on by the assessee was distinguished on facts.
Conclusion: The reassessment and the penalty were upheld and the objection that section 14-B alone applied was rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: Where transactions are found to be colourable or fictitious and are entered into to evade tax by suppressing turnover, the assessing authority may ignore those transactions, reassess the real turnover, and levy penalty for wilful suppression under the Act.