Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a circular issued by the Sales Tax Commissioner in consultation with the Law Department, relaxing the requirement of producing certificates to prove end-use of goods, was binding on the department and could be applied in pending revision proceedings relating to earlier assessment years.
Analysis: The circular was issued under the rule-making framework governing the Act and reflected the Law Department's view that a selling dealer, after sale of goods, has no control over their subsequent use. It removed the practical burden of proving that the goods were actually used for manufacture of brassware, and the interpretation adopted was treated as reasonable and beneficial to dealers. The principle applied was that an administrative circular, even if erroneous, binds the revenue authorities so long as it is beneficial to the assessee, and the department cannot take a contrary stand. As the revisions were part of a continuing chain of proceedings, the benefit of a benevolent circular issued during pendency could not be denied merely because the assessment years preceded the circular.
Conclusion: The circular was held binding on the department and applicable to the pending revisions, so the department could not insist on proof contrary to the circular; the revisions were dismissed, resulting in relief to the assessee.