Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the revisional authority under section 10-B of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948 could revise the assessment order on the basis of materials that came into existence after the assessment order, and whether the additions made on that basis were sustainable.
Analysis: The revisional power under section 10-B is confined to examining the legality or propriety of the order on the basis of the material already available on the assessment record. Subsequent information or materials cannot be treated as the foundation for revision under that provision. If the case is one of escaped assessment, the proper course lies under section 21 and not by stretching revisional jurisdiction under section 10-B. On the facts, the additions founded on the income-tax search statement and other post-assessment materials could not stand. However, the assessment record showed that tax had not been imposed on the purchases of raddi from an unregistered dealer, and that part of the revisional addition was supportable.
Conclusion: The revision could not be sustained to the extent it rested on subsequent materials, but the addition relating to raddi was upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: Revisional jurisdiction under section 10-B of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948 must be exercised only on the basis of material already on the assessment record, and subsequent materials cannot be used to justify revision; escaped assessment, if any, must be proceeded with under the specific assessment provision.