Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the reassessment show cause notices issued under the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act were sustainable in law, and whether the writ petitions could be entertained notwithstanding the availability of an alternative remedy.
Analysis: The notices proposing reassessment under Section 14(4) were issued on the basis of information said to have been obtained from the manufacturer, but that material was not supplied to the dealers. The notices themselves recorded categorical findings of suppression, rejection of books, presumed sales, and proposed penalty under Section 14(8), showing that the authority had already formed a definite conclusion rather than merely calling for an explanation. In such circumstances, the show cause notice was not an and effective opportunity before reassessment. The existence of an alternative remedy did not bar writ jurisdiction where the notices were alleged to be without jurisdiction and issued on a predetermined basis.
Conclusion: The reassessment show cause notices were unsustainable and liable to be quashed, and the writ petitions were maintainable and succeeded in favour of the dealers.