Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether provident fund money retained under the control of the railway administration and routed through the Reserve Bank for conversion into sterling had ceased to be provident fund money so as to become attachable in execution of a decree.
Analysis: The amount remained subject to the railway administration's control until conversion and transmission to the subscriber in the manner prescribed. The Reserve Bank acted only as the agent of the railway administration for conversion and remittance, not as the subscriber's agent to receive payment on his behalf. The statutory immunity from attachment attaching to a compulsory deposit in a recognised provident fund continued so long as the money retained its provident fund character and had not been effectively paid out to the subscriber. Section 50 of the Indian Contract Act did not assist the attaching creditor because the prescribed mode of transmission had not yet resulted in payment to the subscriber.
Conclusion: The money in the hands of the Reserve Bank remained provident fund money and was immune from attachment. The attachment order was illegal and without jurisdiction.