Remand Power Must Be Used Sparingly Where Complete Facts Are On Record, Tribunal Must Decide The Matter On Merits

Where the basic facts necessary for disposal are already on record, a tribunal should not remand the matter merely for fresh scrutiny and must decide the dispute on merits. The discretionary power to remand is to be exercised with restraint, particularly when no further factual investigation is needed. On that basis, the remand directions were held unjustified and were set aside, with the proceedings restored for merits-based determination by the tribunal itself.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appellate tribunal was justified in remanding the matter when the basic facts necessary for disposal were already on record and the dispute could be decided on merits.

Analysis: The record disclosed that the material facts relevant to the assessment dispute were already available before the authority. In such a situation, remand was not warranted merely to enable a fresh scrutiny, because the proper course was to decide the revisional applications on the existing evidence and record a finding on merits. The power to remand is discretionary and must be exercised with restraint, especially where no further factual investigation is necessary for disposal.

Conclusion: The remand order was unjustified and was set aside. The matter ought to have been decided on merits by the tribunal itself.

Final Conclusion: The impugned remand directions were quashed and the petitioners obtained relief by having the proceedings restored to a merits-based determination.

Ratio Decidendi: Where all basic facts necessary for disposal are already on record, a tribunal should not remand the matter and must decide it on merits.

---