Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether proceedings could be treated as reassessment proceedings under section 16 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, and whether the limitation period under that provision barred the assessment when no return had been filed and no original assessment had taken place.
Analysis: Section 16 applies only where turnover has escaped assessment after an original assessment. The legal basis of escapement presupposes that there was a prior assessment process from which turnover could have escaped. In the present case, no return was filed, no turnover was offered for assessment, and no original assessment had been made. The assessment was therefore not one for escaped turnover but an original assessment made after the assessee failed to respond to repeated summons and the pre-assessment notice. The limitation provision for reassessment under section 16 was thus inapplicable.
Conclusion: The challenge to the assessment on the ground of limitation under section 16 failed, and the contention was rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: Reassessment for escaped turnover is maintainable only where there has been an original assessment; in the absence of any original assessment, the limitation governing escaped assessment under section 16 does not apply.