Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the authorities under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 could simultaneously invoke different recovery modes for recovery of admitted tax arrears, including notice to debtors under section 14 and attachment of the petitioner's premises under section 13(3)(aa), in the absence of any express statutory bar.
Analysis: The admitted tax arrears were not in dispute, and the challenge was confined to the legality of the recovery methods adopted. The Court held that the earlier understanding that recovery remedies must be exercised one at a time could not be accepted in the absence of an express restrictive provision. It was held that, in a fiscal statute intended to secure realisation of revenue, the statute may permit more than one recovery mode to operate simultaneously unless the enactment expressly or by necessary implication prohibits such action. The Court further found no illegality, irregularity, or statutory impediment in the recovery steps taken by the authorities.
Conclusion: The simultaneous recovery proceedings were held to be permissible, and the challenge to the recovery action failed.
Ratio Decidendi: In the absence of an express statutory restriction, authorities may resort to multiple modes of recovery simultaneously for collection of admitted tax arrears under a fiscal statute.