Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under section 78(5) of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994 could be imposed automatically for breach of section 78(2) when the declaration form ST-18C was not found accompanying the goods at the time of checking, and whether mens rea was necessary for such penalty.
Analysis: The goods were intercepted without the declaration form, but the remaining documents were found genuine and correct, and the declaration form was produced later along with the reply to the show cause notice. On the concurrent findings recorded by the appellate authorities, no mala fide intention or intention to evade tax could be inferred. Penalty for breach of section 78(2) was held to be attracted only when the contravention was accompanied by mens rea, and a mere technical breach did not justify automatic levy of penalty under section 78(5).
Conclusion: Penalty under section 78(5) was not exigible on the facts found, and the revision petition failed.