Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the High Court should interfere under writ jurisdiction with proposition notices issued for reopening concluded assessments under section 12-A of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957, on the basis of a Commissioner's circular and the claimed scope of an exemption notification, and whether such notices violated the right to carry on business under article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India.
Analysis: The notices were issued to reopen concluded assessments on the footing that turnover relating to computers and related goods had escaped levy because of an alleged misunderstanding of the exemption notification. The Court held that, at the stage of proposition notices, it was unnecessary to adjudicate the exact factual position of the goods transacted or to finally determine the scope of the notification against the charging entry. It found that the notices only called upon the assessees to explain their position before the assessing authority and that the statutory framework provided remedies, including objections, revised returns, appeals, and revisions, if an adverse order were eventually passed.
Conclusion: The Court declined to interfere in writ proceedings and held that the notices did not, by themselves, infringe article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India.