TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court upholds dismissal of writ petition challenging tax order, affirms appeal process and statutory provisions.</h1> <h3>KS. Biyani & Co. Versus Authority for Advance Ruling under AP. Vat Act, Hyderabad and another</h3> The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the order of the Authority for Clarification and Advance Rulings under the A.P. Value Added Tax Act, ... - Issues:Challenge to the order of the Authority for Clarification and Advance Rulings under the A.P. Value Added Tax Act, 2005.Analysis:The writ petition challenged the order of the Authority for Clarification and Advance Rulings, contending that the order was not appealable. The Authority's order mentioned that an appeal could be filed before the A.P. Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal within thirty days. The petitioner argued that the note appended to the order did not confer jurisdiction on the Tribunal as the statute did not make such orders appealable. Reference was made to section 33 of the A.P. Value Added Tax Act, 2005, which specifies cases for appeal, and it was contended that orders under section 67 were not included. Section 67 establishes the mechanism for the Authority, stating that the order would be binding unless appealed before the Tribunal within thirty days. The proviso under section 67(4) clarifies the appeal process before the Tribunal within the specified timeframe.The Court found no merit in the writ petition and dismissed it. However, the petitioner was granted liberty to file an appeal before the appropriate forum. The judgment emphasized the appeal process outlined in the A.P. Value Added Tax Act, highlighting the binding nature of the Authority's order and the appeal mechanism before the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal within thirty days. The dismissal of the petition allowed the petitioner the opportunity to pursue further legal recourse through the appeal process as provided by the Act. The judgment upheld the statutory provisions and the appellate procedure, ensuring the petitioner's right to seek redress through the appropriate legal channels.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
