Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, during the relevant period, the applicant's transport activity and the sale of scrap, unserviceable vehicles and materials constituted "business" so as to make it a "dealer" under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, and whether the applicant was liable to be treated as a dealer for those disposals.
Analysis: The definition of "business" under section 2(5A) required profit motive during the relevant period, and the definition of "dealer" under section 2(11) operated only where a person carried on business of buying or selling goods. The applicant's transport function was a statutory obligation undertaken to provide public transport at controlled fares and not as a profit-making venture. The disposal of old buses, spare parts and scrap occurred only intermittently, after long use, and lacked the volume, frequency, continuity and regularity needed to characterise such disposals as a separate business. The statutory explanation treating certain bodies as deemed dealers did not support treating the applicant's transport activity as business in the relevant period.
Conclusion: The applicant was not carrying on business in relation to its transport activity or the sale of scrap and unserviceable material during the relevant period, and was not a dealer within section 2(11) for those transactions.