Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        VAT / Sales Tax

        2004 (1) TMI 654 - HC - VAT / Sales Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Damaged cereals used as cattle or poultry feed retain their cereal character and qualify for sales tax exemption. Damaged wheat and rice sold by the Food Corporation of India as fit for cattle or poultry feed retain their character as cereals in common parlance and do ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                        Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                          Damaged cereals used as cattle or poultry feed retain their cereal character and qualify for sales tax exemption.

                          Damaged wheat and rice sold by the Food Corporation of India as fit for cattle or poultry feed retain their character as cereals in common parlance and do not cease to be cereals merely because they are unfit for human consumption. On that basis, the goods were held to fall within the relevant exemption entries in the Fifth Schedule, and the later demand for sales tax and cess on such sales was invalid and quashed. The Court also declined a direct refund order against the collecting dealer, noting bona fide collection and remittance to the State, and left the purchaser to seek refund from the State Government in accordance with law.




                          Issues: (i) Whether damaged wheat and rice sold by the Food Corporation of India as fit for cattle or poultry feed fall under entry 15 of the Fifth Schedule to the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 or are taxable under section 5(1) of that Act; (ii) whether the subsequent demand for sales tax and cess on such sales was valid; (iii) whether the first respondent was liable to refund the tax collected from the petitioner.

                          Issue (i): Whether damaged wheat and rice sold by the Food Corporation of India as fit for cattle or poultry feed fall under entry 15 of the Fifth Schedule to the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 or are taxable under section 5(1) of that Act.

                          Analysis: The Court held that the character of a grain does not cease merely because it is damaged or unfit for human consumption. A cereal continues to remain a cereal if it is still fit for consumption by livestock or poultry. Entry 6 of Part A of the Second Schedule, dealing with animal feed, did not apply because the goods sold were not processed commodities. The Court relied on the ordinary meaning of cereals, the definition in section 14 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, and prior decisions holding that damage or inedibility does not necessarily alter the identity of the commodity. However, if the damaged grains are classified only for manure or for manufacture of inedible industrial starch, they would fall outside the exemption.

                          Conclusion: Damaged wheat and rice sold as fit for cattle or poultry feed fall under entry 15 of the Fifth Schedule, and for the earlier period under entries 64 and 40A of the Fifth Schedule, and are exempt from tax.

                          Issue (ii): Whether the subsequent demand for sales tax and cess on such sales was valid.

                          Analysis: Once damaged rice and wheat classified by the Food Corporation of India as fit for cattle or poultry feed were held to be exempt cereals, no tax could be demanded on their sale under section 5(1) of the Act. The later communication seeking tax and cess was therefore inconsistent with the legal position determined on the first issue.

                          Conclusion: The demand for sales tax and cess was invalid and was quashed.

                          Issue (iii): Whether the first respondent was liable to refund the tax collected from the petitioner.

                          Analysis: The Court noted that the first respondent had acted bona fide under the Commissioner's clarification and had already remitted the tax to the State. In those circumstances, a direct refund order against the first respondent was not considered appropriate. The petitioner was left at liberty to seek refund from the State Government, which would have to deal with such application in accordance with law.

                          Conclusion: The first respondent was not directed to refund the tax; the petitioner was relegated to seek refund from the State Government.

                          Final Conclusion: The writ petition succeeded to the extent of declaring the damaged grains exempt when sold as cattle or poultry feed and quashing the impugned demand, while the claim for direct refund against the first respondent was declined.

                          Ratio Decidendi: A damaged grain does not lose its identity as a cereal merely because it is unfit for human consumption if it remains fit for consumption as livestock or poultry feed; exemption entries must be construed according to the commodity's essential character in common parlance.


                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found