Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether reassessment under section 19(1) of the M.P. General Sales Tax Act, 1958 was valid when the assessing officer sought to alter the original basis of assessment by substituting sales tax for purchase tax.
Analysis: Section 19(1) is confined to cases of under-assessment, escaped assessment, assessment at a lower rate, or wrong deduction. Where the assessing officer does not merely correct an escaped item but seeks to change the very basis of the original assessment, the action is in the nature of a review and not a reassessment within the scope of section 19(1). In such a situation, the proper course lies under section 39(1) and not under section 19(1). The impugned notice was therefore held to be beyond jurisdiction.
Conclusion: The reassessment proceedings under section 19(1) were not legally sustainable and the question was answered against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee.