Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a dealer having more than one place of business in Delhi was entitled to nominate one branch as the head office for the purposes of the Delhi Sales Tax Act, 1975 and the Delhi Sales Tax Rules, 1975, and whether the revenue could object to such nomination.
Analysis: Rule 51 contemplated nomination of one of the dealer's branches as the head office where the dealer had more than one place of business in Delhi. The nomination operated for the purposes of the rules and enabled centralized filing of applications, returns and statements through the head office for administrative convenience. Once the statutory condition of having more than one place of business was satisfied and the nomination was made in accordance with the rule, the revenue had no basis to refuse recognition of the nominated head office.
Conclusion: The nomination could not be objected to by the revenue, and the impugned letter was liable to be quashed in favour of the petitioner.