Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the notices issued under section 29-A of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948 could be quashed and the excess amount refunded to the dealer could be adjusted towards its admitted tax liability for a later assessment year.
Analysis: The Court followed the earlier decision between the same parties and the prior decision relied upon therein. On that basis, it held that the impugned notices could not stand and that the refundable amount, having been refunded to the Indian Oil Corporation for the relevant assessment years, was liable to be adjusted against the petitioner's tax liability for the assessment year 1989-90.
Conclusion: The notices were quashed and the excess refund was directed to be adjusted towards the petitioner's tax liability.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a refundable amount has been wrongly refunded in relation to earlier assessment years, it may be adjusted against the assessee's admitted tax liability for a later assessment year, and notices contrary to that entitlement are unsustainable.