Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Commissioner, in exercise of revisional jurisdiction under section 39(2), could initiate and impose penalty for the first time under section 43(1) of the M.P. General Sales Tax Act, 1958 even though no penalty had been imposed by the assessing authority in the original assessment.
Analysis: Section 39(2) empowers the Commissioner to examine any proceeding and pass appropriate orders where the assessment order is erroneous and prejudicial to revenue, while section 43(1) confers an additional power on the Commissioner or appellate authority to impose penalty in the course of any proceeding under the Act if satisfied that turnover was deliberately concealed or a false return furnished. The earlier view that revisional power could not extend to a first-time penalty under section 43(1) did not notice the statutory width of section 43(1). The later view, supported by the Supreme Court, recognized that the words "in the course of any proceeding under the Act" are wide enough to include proceedings under section 39(2), and that imposition of penalty under section 43(1) is not barred merely because the assessing authority did not act under that provision initially.
Conclusion: The Commissioner has jurisdiction to initiate penalty proceedings and impose penalty for the first time under section 43(1) while acting under section 39(2), after giving a reasonable opportunity of hearing.