TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the revisional authority could invoke its power under section 46(4) of the Bihar Finance Act, 1981 to examine the assessment orders. (ii) Whether excise duty formed part of the sale price and gross turnover, and whether trade discount could be allowed on the excise component of the sale price.
Issue (i): Whether the revisional authority could invoke its power under section 46(4) of the Bihar Finance Act, 1981 to examine the assessment orders.
Analysis: The revisional power under section 46(4) is a supervisory jurisdiction confined to examining the legality or propriety of an order. It is not an appellate power, but it may be exercised where relevant materials are ignored, statutory provisions are wrongly applied, or a serious error of law or procedure occurs. On the facts, the authority acted on the footing that relevant statements from the excise department had not been considered and that the allowance of discount was contrary to law, which was held to be a valid basis for revision.
Conclusion: The invocation of revisional power was held to be valid and was not interfered with.
Issue (ii): Whether excise duty formed part of the sale price and gross turnover, and whether trade discount could be allowed on the excise component of the sale price.
Analysis: Sale price under section 2(u) means the amount payable as consideration for the sale, and gross turnover under section 2(j) is the aggregate of sale prices received or receivable. Applying the settled law on excise duty, the Court held that the taxable event for excise is manufacture, but where the purchaser pays the duty to discharge the manufacturer's liability, the payment remains part of the consideration for the sale. Accordingly, excise duty was treated as a component of sale price and includible in gross turnover. At the same time, trade discount is not the same as cash discount and, in principle, a bona fide trade discount may be allowed on the sale price as a whole. Once excise duty forms part of sale price, the discount cannot be restricted by splitting the sale price into separate components, though its allowance and extent depend on the facts and bona fides of the claim.
Conclusion: Excise duty was held to be part of the sale price and gross turnover, and trade discount was held capable of being considered on the whole sale price, subject to factual scrutiny.
Final Conclusion: The assessment matters required reconsideration by the assessing authority in light of the legal position that excise duty is includible in sale price, while the entitlement to trade discount depends on the facts and bona fides of each case.
Ratio Decidendi: Where excise duty is paid to discharge the manufacturer's liability, it forms part of the consideration for sale and is includible in sale price and gross turnover; trade discount, if bona fide, must be assessed on the sale price as a whole and not by artificially segregating its components.
TaxTMI 
