Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, under section 45-A(a) of the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958, the period of thirty days for applying to set aside an ex parte assessment order begins from the date fixed for hearing or from the date on which the ex parte order is actually passed.
Analysis: Section 45-A is a provision enabling a dealer to seek setting aside of an ex parte assessment order and reopening of the case. Read as a whole, its operation depends on the existence of an ex parte order, and the limitation must therefore be linked to that order rather than to a mere date fixed for hearing. A literal reading of the words "within thirty days of the date of hearing" would produce an unreasonable and unworkable result where no ex parte order has yet been made. The provision was construed in a purposive and contextual manner so that the expression is understood to mean the date of the ex parte order when the dealer had prior intimation of the hearing.
Conclusion: The limitation under section 45-A(a) commences from the date of passing of the ex parte order and not from the date fixed for hearing; the question was answered in favour of the assessee.