Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the exemption granted by the State notification dated 7 March 1994 for footwear not made of leather and valued up to Rs. 100 was a general exemption so as to extend to inter-State sales under section 8(2-A) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.
Analysis: Section 8(2-A) applies where goods, or a class or category of goods, are exempt from State tax generally and not where the exemption operates only in specified circumstances or under specified conditions. The distinction drawn in the earlier Supreme Court review decision was between conditions attached to the dealer or industrial unit and criteria used merely to identify the goods or class of goods. The notification in question exempted a defined class of footwear itself and did not impose any condition relating to the dealer, manufacturer, or any special circumstance governing the turnover. The prior Rajasthan decision dealing with a different notification was therefore not controlling.
Conclusion: The exemption was a general exemption of a class of goods, and the inter-State turnover of such footwear was exempt under section 8(2-A) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.